FEDERAL CHARACTER/QUOTA SYSTEM AND PRODUCTIVITY OF NIGERIA PUBLIC SERVICE (A CASE STUDY OF NATIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION 2004-2014
 CHAPTER ONE
              INTRODUCTION
            1.1   BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY
Plural and sharply divided societies all over the world attempt  to manage their diversities and divisive tendencies through one or combination  of policy alternatives in the organization and management of their public  services for performance; and Nigeria is not an exception (Bodunrin, 1989;  Ayoade, 2000; Abdullah, 2007). Often times, these policy alternatives turn out  to be delicate arrangements; but when carefully conceived, crafted and  practiced, it provides opportunity for centre-seeking and centre-fleeing forces  to interact peacefully and co-habit on agreed terms which has been proved to  have enhanced productivity. One of such policy alternatives adopted for the  management of the public service in Nigeria for even representation is the  federal character principle, which was borne out of the need to ensure even  spread of government appointments in all the regions, states and local  government councils in the country (Nzeshi, 2012). 
			  
Nigeria is a federal society comprising 36 states structure  with a population of more than 150 million people and has more than 250 ethnic  groups, which necessitate an arrangement that could accommodate people from the  different segments of the country in the public service (Gberevbie, 2012). The  notion of federal character presupposes the existence of a federal society.  However, as a federal state, Nigeria was faced with the challenge of how to  imbibe the principle of federalism in practice. As a result, the quota system  was introduced into the Nigerian public service in 1958 by the government to  ensure equitable representation of the various groups in the country (Tonwe and  Oghator, 2009). To further consolidate on the gains of the quota system, the  Federal Military Government of Generals Murtala Mohammed and Olusegun Obasanjo  in the drafting and approval of the 1979 constitution of the Federal Republic  of Nigeria during the transition to civilian rule (1976-79) introduced into the  Nigerian political and administrative landscapes the principle of federal  character (Ekeh, 1989). Federal character principle sought to give opportunities  in education and employment, usually at the point of entry, to disadvantaged  groups and areas to enable them compete and catch up with more advanced areas  and sectors of the nation (Ekeh, 1989). 
			  
In comparing the practice of quota system with that of the federal  character principle, Ekeh (1989) posits that the latter demands far more than  the former in the sense that it switches emphasis from opportunities to  privileges and benefits. He argues that federal character principle is a legal  weapon put in place to regulate appointments, promotions, security of tenure  and severance in every government department. The reference to the phrase disadvantaged  groups in the area of educational opportunities means that special  consideration should be given to candidates from the Northern provinces and  other areas where educational facilities were more backward than elsewhere  (Gboyega, 1989). The awkward application of the federal character principle  tends to pose challenges to the productivity of the Nigerian public service  through the circumscription of merit. Such practice of the principle of federal  character in personnel procurement without due regard for merit is more likely  to mire efforts at sustainable development in a society. 
			  
The formal adoption of the federal system in Nigeria, which  came into existence with the introduction of the Lyttleton constitution of  1954, signaled the need for representative bureaucracy that could address the  problem in the composition of the federal public service anchored on productive  service delivery (Adamolekun, 1989; Ayoade, 2000; Ikelegbe, 2004). Accordingly, Max Weber (1864-1920) showed  the way forward on how to achieve organizational productivity through the  theory of ideal bureaucracy; and it is doubtful if any modern human organization,  whether in public and private sector can function adequately without adhering  to the principle of rationality in employee procurement and rewards as  postulated by Max Weber (Edigin and Otoghile, 1994; Anyebe, 2004). 
			  
The main focus of this research project is the  Federal Civil Service. The Civil Service is a body without which the business  of government would be impossible to operate. The role of the civil servant is  so vital that such personnel is expected to be productive, progressive and  enterprising; hence the need to employ well educated, skilled and experienced  people.
			  But for political reasons, the Federal Civil  Service now combines the administrative ethics of merit and political doctrine  of federal character as a recruitment policy because of the need for a  representative bureaucracy.
			  
The federal character principle was incorporated as  an employment policy having taken into cognizance the impervious and insistence  demand by each ethnic group, no matter how small numerically, or how poor  materially, or how backward educationally for a fair and dignified place in the  Nigeria sum.
			  For some time now, the Federal Civil Service has  come under criticism because its performance and productivity left much to be  desired. Many attribute its unproductive and inefficiency to the adoption of  the Federal Character Principle which they believe negates the administrative  ethics of merit system –skill, qualification, experience through training which  are the basic criteria for efficiency. However, this study  seek to examine the relationship between federal character/quota system and  productivity of Nigeria public service.
1.2   STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
			  The perennial problem of imbalance in our national  life had revolved around other sectors of the economy, the immediate problem  which prompted the research to investigate on is the issues relating to the  allocation of educationally based positions among the federating units relates  to federal character principle which means that all the geo-political zones  will be given equal chance for the appointment and output-efficiency as it  relates to observation of federal character principle.
			  In the related development, there have been  discriminatory attitudes on many federal institutions in terms of employment  into the Nigerian civil service as there are a specific numbers of candidates  to be taken from each state. There is also a problem of quota system in the  area of employment into the federal civil service, which has introduced  mediocrity in the service.
			  
Consequently, there has been gross misconduct in  the area of employment due to sectional consciences and nepotism from those in  authority in the Ministries and Parastatals. Federal institutions seem to  recruit on nepotism and favoritism without minding the effect of such practices  to the productivity, efficiency of service delivery and quality of output to  the nation. Even when the federal character principle is observed, the  institution will not consider efficiency of the candidate hence they are  relatives and will not follow the due process thereby cutting corners in the  recruitment exercise. All these problems have been a hydra-headed challenge to  the Federal Character Commission. 
              1.3   OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
			  The  following are the objectives of this study:
- To examine the relationship between federal character/quota system and productivity of Nigeria public service.
 - To investigate whether certain standard are maintained in the course of recruitment on quota basis in the country’s civil service.
 - To determine the factors militating against productivity in the Nigeria public service.
 
1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
- What is the relationship between federal character/quota system and productivity of Nigeria public service?
 - Are there any certain standard maintained in the course of recruitment on quota basis in the country’s civil service.
 - What are the factors militating against productivity in the Nigeria public service?
 
1.5   HYPOTHESIS
			  HO:  There is no relationship between federal character/quota system and  productivity of Nigeria public service
			  HA:  There is relationship between federal character/quota system and productivity  of Nigeria public service
  1.6   SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
			  The study of implications of application of Federal  Character Principle for efficiency in the civil service is of immense benefit  to different institutions, especially those institutions that needed employment  related data for their routine activities. From such research, Federal Civil  Service Commission can tell if the character principle is observed in every  batch of recruitments conducted by different Federal Agencies and whether such  recruitment is orderly conducted through the help of Federal Commission.
			  Again, by observing the character principle, the  federal Bureau of Statistics can collate and manage data on  employment-unemployment situation and through that ascertain the living  conditions of different age brackets in liaison with National Population  Commission that would give out the population of such age brackets. All these  groups will benefit from a research of this nature because if well managed,  because the result would have relationship with sustainable development with  the help of efficient manpower development. 
  1.7   SCOPE/LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
			  The  scope on the study on federal character/quota system and productivity of  Nigeria public service will cover all the issues of employment in the Nigerian  civil service analyzing the methods of selection (i.e. the merit system of the  federal character/quota system) considering the effects of both of them on  productivity in the federal civil service
1.8   DEFINITION OF TERMS
                Federal Character: The system of distributing positions/resources to reflect  the ethnic, regional or sectional differences in Nigeria, irrespective of  whether the person concerned is the most qualified or not.
                Civil Service: Refers to the organization, personnel, practices and procedures  essential to effective performance of the civilian functions entrusted to the  executive branch of government comprising those public servants appointed on  merit on a permanent, contract or temporary basis without any inferences of  political considerations for the purpose of executing public policy. Thus, the  civil service whenever referred to in this work means federal government  employee, organization practices and procedures directly involved in public administration.
                Representation/Representative: A condition which exists when the characteristics  and acts of one vested with public functions are accordance with the desires of  one or more persons to whom the functions have objective and subjective  importance. It therefore carries with it authority and legitimacy as such  person performs has duty on behalf of others. 
                Quota: A quota is inflexible number that be reached within a given period of  time, regardless of the methods used or the availability of candidates. Here,  there is the possibility or every tendency that whoever presents himself will  be accepted to fill the gap: thus, the acceptable standard might be lowered to  achieve this aim. That seems to be the fate of the federal character principle  as it is now being applied especially in the federal civil service, considering  the grave imbalance between the regions or ethnic groups in Nigeria.
                National Ideology: A set of concepts, doctrine, beliefs to which the members  of a society are committed and which identified the national character of the  country; ideology therefore functions to influence and justify certain kinds of  behaviours and claims. 
REFERENCES 
			  Abdullah, S.A.  (2007) “The Civil Service Reforms.” In H. Saliu, Amali, E; Olawepo, R. (eds) Nigeria’s  Reform Programme: Issues and Challenges. Ibadan: Vantage Publishers Ltd.  pp. 342-362.
			  Adamolekun, L.  (1989) “The Nigerian Civil Service: Problems of Manpower Development,  Utilization and Orientation.” In A. Gboyega, Abubakar, Y. and Aliyu, Y. (eds) Nigeria  Since Independence: The First 25 Years (Public Administration). Ibadan:  Heinemann Educational Books. Pp. 41-60.
			  Anyebe,  A.A. (2004) “An Assessment of the Traditional system of Public Administration.” The Abuja Management Review. Vol. 2 (1). March. pp. 15-27. 
			  Ayoade,  J.A.A. (2000) “The Federal Character Principle and the Search for National  Integration.” In K. Amuwo, Suberu, R., Adigun, A. and Herault, G. (eds) Federalism  and Political Restructuring in Nigeria. Ibadan: Spectrum Books Ltd. pp.  101-120. 
			  Bodunrin, P.  (1989) ¨Federal Character and Social Justice.¨ In P.P. Ekeh and E.E. Osaghae  (eds) Federal Character and Federalism in Nigeria. Ibadan: Heinemann  Educational Books Nigeria Ltd. pp. 303-324.
			  Edigin, L.U.  and A. Otoghile (1994) A Theoretical Approach to Public Administration.  Benin City: Nationwide Publications Bureau.
			  Ekeh, P.P.  (1989) “The Structure and Meaning of Federal Character in the Nigerian  Political System.” In Ekeh, P.P and Osaghae, E.E. (eds) Federal Character  and Federalism in Nigeria. Ibadan: Heinemann Educational Books. pp. 19-44.
			  Gberevbie,  D.E. (2012) ¨Forms of Political Administrative System.¨ In R. Ajayi and  Fashagba, Y. (eds) Introductory text in Political Science. Omu-Aran:  Landmark University. pp. 187-210.
			  Gboyega, A.  (1989) “The Public Service and Federal Character.” In P.P. Ekeh & Osaghae,  E.E. (eds) Federal Character and Federalism in Nigeria. Ibadan:  Heinemann Educational Books. pp. 164-185.
			  Ikelegbe, A.  (2004) Issues and Problems of Nigerian Politics. Lagos: Imprint  Services.
			  Nzeshi, O.  (2012, March 11) “The Quest to Amend Federal Character Commission Act”. ThisDay  Newspaper (Lagos). pp. 97-98.
			  Tonwe, D.A  & Oghator, E.O. (2009) “The Federal Character Principle and Democratic  Stability in Nigeria.” In Ola, R.F. & Tonwe, D.A. (eds) Nigerian Public  Administration. Lagos: Amfitop Books. pp. 230-256.
