THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL MEDIA ON VOTING BEHAVIOUR IN NIGERIA (A CASE STUDY OF SELECTED VOTERS IN LAGOS)
CHAPTER  ONE
                INTRODUCTION 
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
The advent of internet  and technology has exposed majority of the global population to different interactive  platforms on which different kinds of information is exchanged which might  significantly have effect on human behaviour, decision and judgment (CES, 2012).  Social media are new information network and information technology using a  form of communication utilizing interactive and user-produced content, and  interpersonal relationships are created and maintained. The emergence of the  Internet as the new mass medium of the 21st century now changes the  mass media substantially. Information can be distributed at high speed, low  cost, and broad scope and as a result, there is egalitarian access to the  production and the consumption of news (Prat and Strömberg, 2011)
			  
Today’s social media has  made the world a “global village”, with the quick transfer of information overriding  the challenges of time and distance (Friedman, 2007). Social media’s has  gradually become one of the important means of influencing the society and this influence is based exclusively  on its social aspects of interaction and participation. As social media gains  more popularity and scope, its impact on voters’ political and cultural  perceptions cannot be underestimated as social media practically influences the  way users interact, communicate and make decisions on social, cultural, and  political issues in today’s world.
			  Voting  behavior is a form of political behavior exhibited by electorates which can be  influenced by a lot of factors ranging from emotional, ethnicity, religion leading  them to make certain decisions. Various factors such as gender, race, culture  or religion go a long way in affecting the way a voter behaves and the decision  he makes as regards selection of a candidate of his choice. However, key external  factors may also influence a voter’s behaviour such as political socialization,  socio-cultural views, tolerance of diverse political views and the media,  internet inclusive. The effect of these influences on voting behavior is dependent  on attitudes, beliefs, knowledge and the source of available information to the  voter. 
The social media has become a powerful medium which may  affect voting behavior because of its potential to provide direct and cheap  access to the production and consumption of current information at any part of  the world without editorial filtering (Sunstein, 2001). Not only do social  media provide information about political affiliations, candidates and their  party manifestoes, it also provides a platform through which voters across  cultural divides can relate and interact with themselves on issues about these  candidates. 
			  As evidenced by the recent March 28th  Presidential elections in Nigeria, political parties, including the two  prominent parties took to social media platforms such as online networking  sites, blogs, mobile newspapers, news ads, etc. to campaign and mobilize not  only youths but all class of internet users to vote for them. This brought  about a variety of interesting news and drama online providing opportunity for  users to read, respond, interact, argue and trash out issues online. Twitter,  facebook, blogs, online newspapers etc. became platforms for people to air  their thoughts on various candidates, and sway others towards their line of  thinking with various debates, hashtags and online campaigns. This brought all Nigerians  together irrespective of political divide, ethnicity and religion on national  issues. 
			  Nearly every political party  in the country used social media to campaign and advance its plans, message and  manifestoes to supporters including advertising, mobilization and organizing in  all the states of the federation, and even fundraising. Facebook, YouTube and especially  Twitter were used to let voters know how each party or particular candidate  felt about important national issues ranging from security to power. Hence  social media became powerful enough to influence voter decisions and choices as  many voters who had fixed their minds and conscience on voting a particular  party or candidate began to change their minds based on certain information or  idea they got online about the party or candidate. Information gotten by a  particular voter was also not static, as the same voter would use several  internet tools and buttons to broadcast same message to other voters like him  through medium such as blogs, facebook, Nairaland, chat rooms etc. in order to  influence them.  
              
1.2     STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
			  The use of  emotional appeals in political campaigns to increase support for a candidate or  decrease support for a challenger is a widely recognized practice and a common  element of any campaign strategy (Brader, T. 2006). Campaigns often seek to  instill positive emotions such as zeal and hopefulness about their candidate to  improve turnout and political activism while seeking to raise fear and anxiety  about the opposition. Zeal tends to reinforce preference for the candidate and  party, while fear and anxiety interrupt voter behavioral patterns and leads  individual voters to look for new sources of information on divergent political  issues (Marcus et al, 2000). Sources of information available to a voter vary  widely including the traditional media, TV, radio and newspapers. However, with  the advent of online social media forum, most voters can access information,  debate on the information and also give feedback on his own views, opinions and  expectations from the party and candidate. 
			  
Although  the social media has helped in increasing the popularity of candidates and  their parties, it has the capacity to make or mar their chances and voter’s  perception of the party or candidates. Rumors, falsehood, propaganda and  derogatory information about individual candidates or parties are commonplace  online and spread faster than anticipated, often with disastrous outcomes. This  is largely attributed to the lack of editorial filtering, and the anonymity of  most online users. The internet encourages anonymity of its users, which means that those who write and  comment often use nicknames or aliases. Hence, anonymity provides an excellent  opportunity for writing false stories or spreading rumors about candidates and  their parties and this often leads to rancor fear and  anxiety about the opposition party. 
			  This has a huge influence on voter behaviour, as most voters  who read stories online have a tendency to believe such stories without  crosschecking facts and take decisions based on this propaganda. This is a  widely known fact among political parties and they use it to their advantage in  bringing down their opponents. Previous research has  found that it is possible to influence a person' attitudes toward a political  candidate using carefully crafted information about such candidate online,  which in turn may influence the voter’s behavior towards the candidate. Social media can also be used by  various parties to propagate false news and propaganda about the opposition in  order to disfavor such party or candidate in the eyes of the electorates while  exonerating theirs. This has a huge influence on voter behaviour as many voters  make decisions based on such news they read online. 
			  
Furthermore, social media has made voters privy to any kind  of information about politicians and their lives as there are no longer any  isolated places or hiding holes. The private and public lives of society’s most  influential figures including politicians have been made public online. This is  because in today’s world, once a politician declares for a post, his entire  life including his educational background, his family, his job and any past  mistakes or excesses are made public on social media platforms for people to  comment, discuss and publicly judge. Many politicians have been found in  compromising positions with their words or phrase taken out of context and  magnified to huge proportions by opposition parties in order to discredit them. 
			  
Many atimes, people go to the extent of recording private  conversations or actions of these candidates and make the recorded audio or  video public on various social media platforms such as Youtube quickly, with a  view to elicit response and vicious backlash from voters and other online  users. The belief is that it will go a long way in influencing voter’s  behaviour and turning such voter against the candidate since the voter can now  judgmentally make decisions about the candidate based on what he said, did or  other information about him or her. Even though, such information are refuted  sometimes by the concerned party or individual, it remains valid in the minds  of many voters who may have made up their mind already or simply are not aware  of the true situation. 
              
1.3     AIM  AND OBJECTIVES
			  The  general objective of this study is to determine the effect of social media on  voter’s behaviour in Lagos State. The specific objectives are;
- To find out if social media influences voter behaviour in Lagos State
 - To determine the influence social media has on voter behaviour in Lagos state
 - To find out other factors that influence voter behaviour in Lagos state
 
1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
- Does social media influence voter behaviour in Lagos State?
 - What is the influence of social media on voter behaviour in Lagos State?
 - What are the factors that influence voter behaviour in Lagos State?
 
1.5     HYPOTHESES
			  In order to enable the researcher assess  the effect of social media on voter behaviour in Lagos state, the following hypotheses  will be tested:
- Ho: Social media does not have any effect on voter behaviour in Lagos state.
 
HA: Social  media has effect on voter behaviour in Lagos state.
                
1.6     SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
			  This study will help  beam the searchlight on the impact of social media on voter’s behaviour, the  decisions they make and elections as a whole based on the information available  to voters on the internet. It will also enlighten relevant stakeholders such as  political parties, candidates, and even the civil society on how social media can  bring about awareness and campaign opportunities if properly utilized. 
			  This research study  will help stakeholders understand that maintaining a good and healthy profile  online with a cordial relationship between the party and voters can positively  influence voter’s behaviour. Lastly, this research work will add to the body of  knowledge on the already existing scholarly materials on the impact of social  media on voter behaviour.
              
1.7     SCOPE/LIMITATION OF STUDY
			  This study will  examine the impact of social media on voter behaviour in Lagos state with  special reference to the actual influence it has on vote’s behaviour either  positive or negative and the factors determining the behaviour and attitudes  that an ordinary voter adopts based on available information gotten online.
              
1.8     DEFINITION OF TERMS
			  Voter:         a  person who has attained the voting age and has the right to vote for a  candidate in an election 
			  Social media:  are computer mediated tools that allow people  to create, share or 
			  exchange  information, ideas and pictures/videos in virtual communities and online  networks
			  Behaviour:  is the range of actions and mannerisms made by individuals in 
			  conjunction with themselves or their environment. 
			  Internet:      an interconnected group of computer networks allowing for  electronic 
			  communication.  
			  Election:     the formal process of selecting a person for public office or of 
			  accepting or rejecting a political proposition by  voting.  
			  Campaign:  an  organized effort which seeks to influence the decision making process within a  specific group. 
REFERENCES
  Friedman,  T. The World Is Flat 3.0: A brief History of the Twenty-first Century. Picador  2007
  Centre for European Studies (CES), Suomen Toivo  Think Tank, 2012. Social media - the new power of Political influence. Version  1.0 Ari-matti auvinen pgs 4-16
  Prat, A.  and D. Strömberg (2011). The Political Economy of Mass Media. Stockholm  University Working Paper
  Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ:  Princeton University Press.
  Brader, T. (2006), Campaigning for  hearts and minds: how emotional appeals in political ads work, University of  Chicago Press, pp. 2–4
  Marcus, G.; Neuman, R.; MacKuen, M.  (2000), Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment, University of Chicago  Press
Voting Behaviour accessed online at www.wikipedia.com retrieved on 10th April, 2015.