TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT. ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………………………………….iv
CHAPTER ONE. 1
INTRODUCTION. 1
1.1 Background to the Study. 1
1.2 Statement of the Problem.. 5
1.3 Objectives of the Study. 6
1.4 Research Questions. 6
1.5 Research Hypothesis. 7
1.6 Significance of the Study. 7
1.7 Scope of the Study. 8
1.8 Limitations of the Study. 8
1.9 Organization of the Study. 8
1.10 Definition of Terms. 9
CHAPTER TWO.. 12
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE. 12
2.1 Introduction. 12
2.2 Theoretical Review.. 12
2.2.1 The Bipedalism Theory. 12
2.2.2 The Brain Expansion Theory. 13
2.2.3 The Tool Use and Dexterity Theory. 13
2.2.4 The Developmental Plasticity Theory. 14
2.3 Conceptual Review.. 14
2.3.1 Overview.. 14
2.3.2 Comparative Anatomy and Evolutionary Relationships. 15
2.3.3 The Fossil Record and Anatomical Evidence. 15
2.3.4 Bipedalism and Pelvic Adaptations. 16
2.3.5 Brain Size and Cranial Anatomy. 16
2.3.6 Dentition and Dietary Changes. 16
2.3.7 Developmental Patterns and Growth. 17
2.3.8 Functional Anatomy and Evolutionary Adaptations. 17
2.3.9 Paleopathology and Health Indicators. 18
2.4 Empirical Review.. 18
2.5 Summary of Literature Review.. 21
CHAPTER THREE. 23
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY. 23
3.1 Introduction. 23
3.2 Research Design. 23
3.3 Study Area. 24
3.4 Population of the Study. 24
3.5 Sampling Techniques. 25
3.6 Data Collection Methods. 25
3.7 Research Instruments. 26
3.8 Data Analysis. 26
3.9 Validity and Reliability of Research Instruments. 26
3.10 Ethical Considerations. 27
3.11 Limitations of the Study. 27
3.12 Summary. 28
DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION. 29
4.1 Preamble. 29
4.2 Data Analysis. 29
4.3 Tables Based On Research Questions. 34
4.4 Testing Hypothesis. 45
4.5 Discussion of Findings. 46
CHAPTER FIVE. 49
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 49
5.1 Summary of Findings. 49
5.2 Conclusion. 50
5.3 Recommendations. 51
REFERENCES. 53
APPENDICES. 58
Appendix I: Research Questionnaire: The Role of Anatomy in Understanding Human Evolution (A Case Study of Anatomy Department, University of Lagos) 58
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study
Numerous branches of physical anthropology have conducted in-depth research on the evolution of Homo sapiens. Primatology and behavioral analyses of our closest living relatives are among these fields, as are genomic studies that involve the examination of ancient DNA from past populations. Nevertheless, a small and disjointed fossil record that restricts the amount of data available to researchers continues to be a major challenge. Anatomy is one of the many scientific disciplines whose knowledge must be integrated to provide a thorough understanding of human evolution.
The study of anatomy, which focuses on an organism's structural characteristics, is essential to understanding how humans have developed over millions of years. Studies of skeletal anatomy in the context of human evolution have become more important due to the peculiarities of fossil records, where only strong tissues like teeth and bones usually survive the fossilization process (Mounier, 2018).
Reconstructing the lifestyles of extinct hominin species, including their eating patterns and modes of locomotion, in order to generate theories about their ecological niches, and determining the phylogenetic relationships between modern humans and their closest extinct relatives, are the two primary objectives that guide paleoanthropological analysis of skeletal remains. The study of skeletal remains in paleoanthropology is driven by two primary objectives: first, to clarify the evolutionary relationships between extinct hominin species and their closest relatives, and second, to reconstruct the dietary patterns and methods of locomotion of extinct hominin species in order to develop theories regarding their ecological niches.
Comparative techniques of skeletal anatomy applied to both living and extinct relatives of humans are therefore crucial to paleoanthropology. In this anatomical study, fossil evidence plays a critical role. As an illustration, the examination of early hominid fossils, like that of Australopithecus afarensis, offers crucial information about the development of bipedalism and modifications to locomotion (Leakey et al. (2021). Fossils mark an important turning point in evolution by demonstrating adaptations in the lower limb and pelvic structures as well as the shift from an arboreal to a terrestrial lifestyle.
Meanwhile, as evidenced by the thorough examination of the Homo erectus skull, the study of skull fossils has provided insight into the evolution of brain structure and cognitive processes (Rightmire, 2020). In order to properly interpret the skeletal data discovered in the fossil record, scientists use models developed from research on the great apes, which are members of the Homininae subfamily and are Homo sapiens' closest living relatives. The three tribes that make up this subfamily are Gorillin. Panini and Hominini (Mounier, 2018).
The Gorillini and Panini phyla include the four species of great apes: western gorillas (Gorilla gorilla), eastern gorillas (Gorilla beringei), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and bonobos (Pan paniscus) (Roskov et al., 2015). The Hominini tribe consists of the only extant species, Homo sapiens, and their closest extinct relatives, which are divided into various controversial genera. These range from early hominini such as Sahelanthropus, Orrorin and Ardipithecus to the well-known Australopithecus, often divided into the graceful Australopithecus and the robust Paranthropus. This lineage ultimately leads to the genus Homo, which includes modern humans and several controversial ancestral species, including Homo habilis, Homo rudolfensis, Homo ergaster, Homo erectus, and Homo heidelbergensis, as well as sister species such as Homo neanderthalensis (Mounier, 2018).
By analyzing the anatomical features of our ancestors and comparing them to those of modern humans, scientists can deduce the evolutionary pressures that influenced our physical development. This comparative methodology not only helps trace the lineage of modern humans, but also highlights the functional adaptations that have facilitated survival and progress in different environments.
Comparative anatomy greatly improves our understanding of human biology by facilitating comparisons between human anatomical structures and those of other primates. This analytical approach not only emphasizes distinctive features, but also highlights similarities, thus illuminating evolutionary patterns and divergences.
For example, studying the skeletal framework of different primate species helps to identify unique human characteristics, such as the complex adapted structure of the human hand, which is essential for handling tools (Toth & Schick, 2022). These comparisons illustrate how specific anatomical adaptations have evolved over time in response to specific functional demands.
Furthermore, the study of developmental anatomy – with a focus on the growth and maturation of organisms – offers valuable perspectives on evolutionary mechanisms. Developmental biology elucidates the emergence of certain anatomical features during embryonic development and provides insights into the evolutionary changes that have occurred within our lineage. For example, studies of human brain development have revealed similarities with the brain development of other primates and provided important information about cognitive evolution (Rao et al., 2019). This research supports hypotheses about the progressive increase in brain size and complexity throughout human evolution.
In this context, the present study aims to investigate the importance of anatomy in the context of human evolution. It highlights the crucial contribution of the Department of Anatomy, University of Lagos, to promoting research and training in this area.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Understanding human evolution is a complex scientific endeavor that hinges significantly on the study of anatomy. The challenge lies in accurately interpreting anatomical evidence from fossil records to reconstruct the evolutionary lineage of modern humans. Fossilized remains, while invaluable, often present incomplete or fragmented data, making it difficult to derive precise evolutionary relationships and anatomical changes over time (Leakey et al., 2021). This problem is compounded by the fact that anatomical structures may have evolved at different rates or in response to varying selective pressures, further complicating the task of constructing a cohesive evolutionary narrative.
Additionally, comparative anatomy between humans and other primates offers insights into evolutionary developments, but discrepancies between species can obscure the understanding of specific anatomical adaptations. For example, while similarities in skeletal structures can highlight shared evolutionary traits, unique features in human anatomy, such as those related to bipedalism or brain development, require careful interpretation to distinguish between convergent evolution and direct ancestral traits (Toth & Schick, 2022). The challenge here is to accurately differentiate between adaptations that are the result of similar selective pressures in different lineages versus those that are inherited from common ancestors.
1.3 Objectives of the Study
The main objective of the study is to examine the role of anatomy in understanding human evolution. Specific objectives of the study are:
- To examine the evolutionary adaptations of the human skeletal system
- To investigate the role of comparative anatomy in understanding human evolutionary relationships
- To assess the contribution of anatomical studies to reconstructing the paleo environment and behavior of early humans
1.4 Research Questions
To guide the study and achieve the objectives of the study, the following research questions were formulated:
- How have changes in the human pelvis, femur, femur, and foot anatomy facilitated the transition from arboreal to terrestrial locomotion and ultimately to bipedalism?
- What anatomical features distinguish humans from other great apes and how do these differences reflect adaptations to different ecological niches and behavioral patterns?
- How can dental morphology and wear patterns be used to reconstruct the diet and subsistence strategies of early human populations?
1.5 Research Hypothesis
The following research hypothesis was developed and tested for the study:
Ho: Anatomical changes observed in the human fossil record do not significantly contribute to our understanding of human evolution.
1.6 Significance of the Study
The study is important for many reasons. The following are the major stakeholders this paper through its practical and theoretical implications and findings will be of great significance:
Firstly, the paper will benefit major stakeholders and policy makers in the Anatomy sector. The various analysis, findings and discussions outlined in this paper will serve as a guide in enabling major positive changes in the industry and sub-sectors.
Secondly, the paper is also beneficial to the organizations used for the research. Since first hand data was gotten and analyzed from the organization, they stand a chance to benefit directly from the findings of the study in respect to their various organizations. These findings will fast track growth and enable productivity in the organisations used as a case study.
Finally, the paper will serve as a guide to other researchers willing to research further into the subject matter. Through the conclusions, limitations and gaps identified in the subject matter, other student and independent researchers can have a well laid foundation to conduct further studies.
1.7 Scope of the Study
The study is delimited to Anatomy Department, University of Lagos. Findings and recommendations from the study reflects the views and opinions of respondents sampled in the area. It may not reflect the entire picture in the population.
1.8 Limitations of the Study
The major limitations of the research study are time, financial constraints and delays from respondents. The researcher had difficulties combining lectures with field work. Financial constraints in form of getting adequate funds and sponsors to print questionnaires, hold Focus group discussions and logistics was recorded. Finally, respondents were a bit reluctant in filling questionnaires and submitting them on time. This delayed the project work a bit.
1.9 Organization of the Study
The study is made up of five (5) Chapters. Chapter one of the study gives a general introduction to the subject matter, background to the problem as well as a detailed problem statement of the research. This chapter also sets the objectives of the paper in motion detailing out the significance and scope of the paper.
Chapter Two of the paper entails the review of related literature with regards to corporate governance and integrated reporting. This chapter outlines the conceptual reviews, theoretical reviews and empirical reviews of the study.
Chapter Three centers on the methodologies applied in the study. A more detailed explanation of the research design, population of the study, sample size and technique, data collection method and analysis is discussed in this chapter.
Chapter Four highlights data analysis and interpretation giving the readers a thorough room for the discussion of the practical and theoretical implications of data analyzed in the study.
Chapter Five outlines the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the study. Based on objectives set out, the researcher concludes the paper by answering all research questions set out in the study.
1.10 Definition of Terms
1. Anatomy
The branch of biology concerned with the structure of organisms and their parts. In the context of human evolution, anatomy focuses on the physical structures of early hominins and their changes over time, providing insights into how our ancestors adapted to their environments.
2. Paleontology
The scientific study of the history of life on Earth through the examination of plant and animal fossils. In human evolution, paleontology helps reconstruct the anatomy of ancient hominins, shedding light on evolutionary changes.
3. Hominin
A member of the subfamily Homininae, which includes modern humans (Homo sapiens), our immediate ancestors, and other extinct species closely related to us. Studying hominin anatomy helps scientists understand the physical and behavioral traits that define our lineage.
4. Comparative Anatomy
The study of similarities and differences in the anatomy of different species. By comparing the anatomy of humans with that of other primates and extinct hominins, researchers can trace evolutionary changes and infer functional adaptations.
5. Fossil Record
The history of life on Earth as documented by fossils, which are the preserved remains or traces of ancient organisms. The fossil record provides critical anatomical evidence for reconstructing the evolutionary history of humans and their ancestors.
6. Morphology
The study of the form and structure of organisms and their specific structural features. In evolutionary biology, morphology helps analyze changes in physical traits across different species and how these changes relate to evolutionary pressures.
7. Phylogenetics
The study of evolutionary relationships among species or groups of species based on their anatomical and genetic characteristics. Phylogenetic analysis helps map out the evolutionary tree of life and determine how different species, including humans, are related through common ancestry.